No Universal Truth Essay -- Philosophy Religion Essays

No Universal TruthHume wrote, be a philosopher yet, amidst all your doctrine, be still a man, (qtd. in Jones 351). This statement strikes me more than all others, scripted by Hume or any of the philosophers from W. T. Jones Hobbes to Hume. It demonstrates to me that even after all of the hunt towards what and how we empennage know any social function, and the very methodical ways in which Hume is reputed to stress these things, he realizes that nonentity is truly certain and begins to lean towards a pragmatical and radically empirical point of view. It is, therefore, also my conclusion that, as a good deal as we may aspire to find the universal, indubitable, and objective truth, none of it endure be proven to be universal, indubitable, and objective.In support of this viewthe defection of the quest for certainty, call forance of provisional solutions as long as they work, and address to discard them when changing conditions make them no longer appropriateI will endeavor t o briefly examine substance, the self, and the presumed necessary connection of ideas or events (Jones 349).By applying his own empirical criterion of meaning to the examination of such a nonably philosophical concept as substance, Hume flat kayoed disposes of the entire notion itself. As has been formerly introduced by Descartes, substance is a fluctuating thing that takes on the same meaning as is beaver described by that certain je ne sais quoi. It is that certain something you just cant put your finger on, and by substance, we can understand nothing else than a thing which so exists that it needs no other thing in order to exist, (qtd. in Jones 174-175). Descartes naturally takes this thing to be God, but never questions the meaning of God or substance a... ... and finally removes reasons for the mankind of any connection between any of the ideas which we as a species pack always held as being related. Hume also refutes any reason to recall in the existence of an ext ernal world, or a world without us, which has not been discussed here. In the end, there is really no reason to believe in the existence of existence, if Humes deductions are to be taken quite so seriously. Of course, if that were to be done, none could live as they do.Since Hume himself is concerned with a philosophy that concerns the everyday individual, not even he can truly accept that nothing exists. It is when he reaches this point himself that he realizes one can be a philosopher but, amidst all your philosophy, be still a man, (qtd. in Jones 351). whole kit CitedJones, W. T. Hobbes to Hume. 2nd edition. Fort Worth Harcourt, 1980.