Case Study Analysis: Union Carbide Corporation And Bhopal Essay

The Political, Social, and Legal Environment of BusinessCase write up Analysis Union Carbide Corporation and BhopalA single slip in action may cause lasting sorrow. A slight shift in operation at a Union Carbide pesticide plant in Bhopal of India causes a lot of deaths and injuries. What a tragedy it is. Undoubtedly, there must be something wrong with the management of the plant.In addition to the plant, the governments related in India that issued permits and provided incentives for the plant, Bhopal federation officials who permitted slum dwellers to move near the plant in illegal settlements, Indian environmental and safety inspectors should also be responsible for this. The governments related in India issued permits because people need jobs, or people would starve to death. This was one undercoat in my opinion. Soft money from Union Carbide plant may be a nonher reason for issuing permits. It was clearly that the governments in America would not issue a permit to Union Carbi de plant under much(prenominal) circumstances, which lacked of severe environmental standards and permitted slum dwellers to live near the plant and so on. Such actions were the fuses leading to more deaths. Before the major gas fountain from the MCI unit on December 3, 1984, some people were killed because of phosgene gas leakage. However, no one took it seriously in spite of the report by media. unmatched of the reasons that people ignore this was because people didnt know the potential endangerment of the chemical plant. The other reason was that there are not affluent environmental inspectors to cover so many plants in India. Besides, those inspectors had a personality of loose enforcement. Consequently, danger emerged just as the saying goes Nothing comes of nothing.As for the management of Union Carbides Bhopal plant, some steps indeed required to be improved. Let us take a look at the whole process of the gas leak and suck what actions can be improved. The first mista ke in my opinion was that R. Khan, an operator in the MIC complex, neglected to insert a slip blind above the point of pissing entry. This omission violated instructions in the MIC processing manual, the technical manual that set forth procedures established by the chemical engineers who set up the plant. Obviously, the plant failed to emphasize the importance of obeying the processing manual and the danger of disobeying ... ...nk he should be responsible for the whole case. In other words, he should exempt for the whole incident. Generally speaking, the legal system didnt play a very active role in this case. First of all, the India government could do more on digging the truth of the gas leak come forward and set a more strict standard to regulate such(prenominal) dangerous plants in case that another crisis. Second, I didnt see any one who worked in the Union Carbides Bhopal plant should be responsible for that tragedy. Does it mean that all that the India court wanted was money or it just wanted to reduce trial and subsequent appeals because it might excite taken more than twenty years?To sum up, Union Carbide handled the crisis modishly but not well enough because it knew what would the India government and court fight back to this incident. Union Carbide controlled the whole situation and took lead of the lawsuits itself. The India government and court didnt help those victims as much as they needed instead. The function of government, intentional to protect its people, disappeared in this case.BIBLIOGRAPHYUnion Carbide Corporation And Bhopal, in Steiner and Steiner, pp.147-161.