Thursday, February 21, 2019
Articles of Confederation vs Constitution Essay
The Articles of Confederation and coupled States temperament are two enters that regulate the U.S. government into what it is today. The Articles of Confederation (AOC) was the first organization of the United States. Americans soon agnize that this document had to be substantially modified because the U.S. necessitate a si untestedyer government. The AOC was sentiment of as an ineffective national government document, although there were almost absolute points. The AOC was ratified in 1781, and replaced by an improved document know as the United States Constitution in 1789. An unknown person once say, perchance the greatest service rendered by the Articles of Confederation was the impetus its shortcomings gave to those who favored a strong central government. This is an analytical essay supporting this quote by comparing the strengths, weaknesses, and achievements of the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution.The AOC gave recounting many powers which included t he right to obtain war, develop foreign policy, regulate Native American activity in the territories, coin money, run post offices, borrow money, and appoint military officers. Although the AOC seemed to occupy a lot of power, there were also several underlying weaknesses and problems that were non initially addressed. As a result the United States Constitution came into action. This document essentially addressed all the underlying problems of the AOC. The AOC did not allow Congress to levy taxes on individuals which the Constitution addressed. The AOC had no federal official court trunk so the Constitution had a dynamic court system in place which was created to deal with fucks amid citizens and the stirs.The AOC offered no regulation of trade amongst claims and interstate commerce. The Constitution gave Congress the right to regulate trade between states and control interstate commerce. The AOC had no administrator power the president of the United States simply preside d over Congress until the verification of the Constitution which created the Executive branch. This was intentional to give the president a more powerful role in the government. The Executive branch gave the president power to choose his Cabinet members and checks on the power of the judicial and legislative branches. The AOC offered little hope if Congress or the states needed to amend any documents as it called for 100% (13/13) of participantsto agree. The Constitution make it to where a 2/3 vote of both mobs of Congress, plus a 3/4 vote of state legislatures or national traffic pattern could amend a document. In the AOC the representation of states was flawed as it said each state were to receive 1 vote regardless of size.The Constitution in turn fixed this by making the upper house (Senate)give each state 2 votes and the lower house (House of Representatives) is base on population. The AOC did not allow Congress to recruit military troops, but was qualified on states to co ntribute forces. The Constitution allows for Congress to raise an army when needed in military situations. The AOC had a complicated system of arbitration in effect and the Constitution issued federal courts the right to handle disputes. Sovereignty was an issue while the AOC were in place as it resided in the states whereas the Constitution created the compulsive law of the land. When passing law the AOC required 9/13 to clear legislation and the Constitution made it majority vote in both houses plus the signature of the President. The AOC faced many challenges and did not maintain golf-club as the United States needed. It essentially did not work for the United States which is wherefore the confirmation of it is such a historical outcome of the United States. each these ratifications of the AOC did not come so simple to the United States. There was a Constitutional gathering in Philadelphia on May 25, 1787 to solve the problems of the AOC. It was at this convention that many protrudes were proposed, and compromises were reached. The weaknesses of the AOC had to be addressed. The first be after introduced by regulator Edmund Randolph, was the Virginia Plan, better known as the Large State Plan, called for a strong national government with bicameral legislation apportioned by population. This plan also called for the lower house to be elected directly by the people and the upper house to be elected by the lower house. This plan as well called for a Chief Executive and a Federal Court system, and it gave Congress the power to tax and regulate interstate commerce.The Large State Plan gave the national government the power to legislate, and gave a proposed national Council of Revision a veto power over state legislatures. The delegates loved the sound of this fundamental reform plan. The Virginia Plan struck face-off among delegates from the little states and thus a competing plan, presented by William Patterson, known as the raw JerseyPlan, or Small State Plan, came into action. This plan kept federal powers rather limited and created no new Congress. Instead, the plan en bigd some of the supremacies then held by the Continental Congress. It also called for a plural executive branch and a federal court system like the Virginia Plan. This plan was not as highly sought out as the Virginia Plan, so in turn was rejected which caused the supporters of the Virginia Plan to make amends to the smaller states. This in turn resulted in members of the Senate being elected by the state legislatures. After the Virginia and New Jersey Plan delegates worked out a series of compromises between these competing plans.The first was The Great Compromise, or the Connecticut Compromise, which resulted in a bicameral legislature House of Representatives (lower house), which was representation based on population, and the Senate (upper house), which was based on equal representation where each state would have 2 senators selected by the state legisla tures. Another compromise reached was The Three-fifths Compromise. This was proposed over the counting of slaves and it compulsive that slaves would be counted as three-fifths of a vote for both purposes of taxation, and purposes of representation in the House of Representatives. On September 17, 1787, a majority of the delegates to the Constitutional Convention approved the documents over which they had labored since May. To prove the Constitution it was determined that 9 of the 13 states had to agree to the ratification in order for the new Constitution to go into effect.Although 9 states is all the government needed to uphold the new document, Congress knew it was important to get the support of the large states, New York and Virginia, in order for the new government to be effective. Delaware was the first state to ratify and soon after 4 more states joined in on the ratification. There were those who favored ratification, better known as the Federalists, and those who opposed the ratification, known as Anti-federalists. The Federalists fought back and convinced the states that rejection of the Constitution would result in insurrection and civil strife. The Anti-federalists argued against the ratification that the delegates in Philadelphia had exceeded their congressional authority by surrogate the AOC with an illegal new document. Others protested that the delegates in Philadelphia represent only the noble few, and thus hand crafted a document that saved their special interests and set apart the franchise for the propertied classes.The Anti-federalistsalso argued that the Constitution would give too often power to the central government at the expense of the states, and that a legate government could not manage a republic as large as the United States. The biggest objection by the Anti-federalists was the Constitutional Convention had failed to get married a Bill of Rights. The Federalists believed that the Constitution was so constrained that it posed no threat to the rights of citizens. It was clear in order to get the remainder of the states on the ratification side that the government had to put a Bill of Rights in place. The Federalist assured the public that the first step of the new government would claim a Bill of Rights.Soon after, The Federalist Papers were written by can buoy Jay and Alexander Hamilton of New York, and James Madison of Virginia. This document encouraged the ratification of the Constitution. These papers circulated through New York and other states and soon after ratification passed in the New York and Virginia state conventions. The last and final state to ratify the Constitution was Rhode Island. After it was faced with threatened treatment as a foreign government, it passed ratification of May 29, 1790.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment