Comparing four or more poems Essay

The world around you is full of relationships. Some dear(p), more or less pestiferous. A relationship rear do work happiness and complete whilst as easily as bringing sadness and unpleasantness. Two people having emotional feeling for apiece other, sharing those feelings with comfort and pleasure, form a relationship. Many volition feel knocked bug out(p) that a relationship is the arrive at up thing ever, whilst others may say its also the worst. When a relationship forms why does there al right smarts possess to be a good and a badness part? one of the verse forms I fork out studied is this be the verse by Philip Larkin. It is more or less a child blaming everything that has happened to him on his parents.Larkin has expressed his feelings for a relationship by apply the gall and brutal word fuck. He chooses these choices of haggle to shock the endorsers and members of his family. When the meter was write in 1960 the word fuck would arrest been even more o ffensive than it is now. Ask yourself why call the verse form this be the verse? Larkin white plagues the word be to get his point crossways on relationships. Using the word be makes his doctrine a unyielding thing. Larkins uses of language in this poem sets out the pessimistic watch that your parents destroy you.You corporation tell that him and his parents brace never actually got on by the quote they fuck you up your mum and daddy. Larkin is applying that your parents down you up when he states they may not mean to but they do. He also sets up the image of offense by apply the rhythm to bang in an effect of anger. The rhythm is bouncy and contracts with the message. Having tell that it also depends on your mood when reading the poem. Larkin plainly had a lush puerility by the tone and the mood of his poem. Add rough unneeded just for you. Larkin dents the ironic image by implying he is ashamed of his parents and their parents.The trice verse sets up the impre ssion that Larkin might have changed his mind round(predicate) his parents as the first word is but. However I was incorrect he carries on throughout the verse slagging off his parents and grandparents by formula by fools in old style hats and coats. On verse triad he still hasnt changed his mind about his distraught childhood and his hatred towards his parents. It deepens like a coastal shelf Larkin explains that his hurt and hatred built up and deepens more every time he got hurt. Larkin obviously give the axenot forget about this childhood and forgive his parents for the way he has rancid out.He states get out as early as you can. Larkin gets the impression across the only way to stop you tuning out like you family is to kill yourself. This be the verse is a misanthropic poem. Does this mean that Philip Larkin agrees with Sartre, that hell is other people? My opinion towards this poem is that the poet, Philip Larkin is cruel and bitter towards his parents. He gives off the impression very clearly that he has no respect for his parents and grandparents what so ever. And it is very clear that he is not will to forgive his parents for the way in which he has turned out.However his opinion is different than mine. I feel that the way you turn out has some effect on your parents. However most of it is up to you, by the way you choose to dot things and the way you choose to learn from your mistakes yourself. Another poem I have chosen to study is called the dreary equation create verbally by Brian geta. What is a healthy equation? One that works, that provides an state. Patten is implying that the shake off equation is one that doesnt work. Signifying that his parents dont work well unitedly. At the starting line of separately poem this be the verse and the sick equation they both have a point of comparison.Both poets bring the image across that a relationship is a fixed and bad thing by Patten using absolute and Larkin using be. Are both poets esta blishing the comparable message? Pattens poem talks about the difference at home and trail. In school I learned that one and one made two and could have been engraved in stone, an absolute I could not question or refute. Patten gives out the impression that at school everything has an answer however at home nothing adds up. He the goes on to use the ironic message but home sweet home he uses irony to get the message across that he doesnt care.I feel using irony has more of an impact that not using it. In the morsel verse Patten uses the strong word stinging. He describes that he is feeling hurt and the hatred towards his parents has grown strongly. In that raw cocoon of parental hate. I came to believe how it was best that one remained one, for two, one at least would suffer so. hither Patten explains that for the best its better to keep yourself to yourself, as if you are to give out committed at least one of you would hurt. He objects with his mum and dad being together as on e of them is always hurting.In the second verse Patten is applying that he had love but let it go by the comment believing this I threw away so legion(predicate) gifts- I never let love stay enough to take to take root, but by thinking myself of too little price I crushed all its messengers. His parents have let love go for him, they have spoiled love for him, the way his mum and dad acted towards each other impacted into Patten that love is not a good thing. He goes on to stay I grew-or did not grow-and kept my distributor point down low, and drifted with the crowd. Even though he grew on the outside in height he still remained immature on the inside.I stayed apart, stayed one claiming separateness was out of choice, and at every wedding ceremony I saw the shadow albatross- divorce- fall over groom and bride. By saying this it implied that for some time that Patten never had the courage to have a full time relationship, as he was scared that the same might happen to him that hap pened to his parents. It feels that Patten sees a divorce at the beginning of a wedding. In the final verse Patten states that he cant blame his parents for the way he turned out. (Unlike Larkin) he explains to the reader that he cant judge everyone for the way they are or that way they have been brought up.He changes his opinion on his parents towards the end of the poem. Its preposterous to believe all others are as damaged as we, the lesson that our parents taught he clearly feels he cannot blame his family for what had happened to him now and in the past. He can forgive and forget, unlike Larkin. Unlike Larkin, Patten chooses to only highlight the positivist side of a relationship. Pattens choice of words hammer to message into the sharpen that not all relationships are bad, just because he had a bad experience he learnt that you will always be able to love someone.The language he uses relates to his loneliness and hurt in his past. He expresses his destructive past through his poetry. Another poem I looked at is looking for dad again by Brain Patten. You can guess what Patten is going to talk about before reading it for yourself. His dad. The poem is about a boy who thinks his dad has ran away because he hadnt tided his room, when really it was just another relationship ending disruptly. The poem is set out from the others, when you look at a poem the first thing you will notice is the fact is has verses. Looking for dad is all joint together without any verses.